Skip to content
Interactive walkthrough

Run Vendor Reviews on a Governed, Repeatable Cadence

See how third-party reviews follow a governed cadence from onboarding through reassessment.

4 steps · ~1 minGuided walkthrough

What you'll see

See the exact workflow, the proof that stays attached, and the control points that keep reviews from turning back into document chasing.

Aurora Command vendor management showing vendor registry with risk scores

Vendor risk at a glance

1 of 4
1/4

What you can verify in this walkthrough

You are seeing the live workflow, the attached proof trail, and the control points that matter once reviewers ask follow-up questions.

Structured vendor intake

New vendors enter a governed onboarding path with risk tier assignment, questionnaire dispatch, and due diligence tracking.

Questionnaire cycles stay on track

Reassessment cadences trigger automatically. Overdue vendors surface before gaps become audit findings.

Exposure tracking stays current

Risk exposure updates as questionnaire responses and due diligence artifacts arrive, keeping the vendor risk picture current.

Why this workflow matters

Third-party risk reviews stall without a governed cadence. When due diligence, questionnaires, and exposure tracking follow a repeatable process, nothing falls through procurement cycles.

Tell us about one vendor due for reassessment

In the live walkthrough, we show the intake path, questionnaire cycle, and how risk exposure stays visible.

Vendor intakeQuestionnaire cyclesExposure tracking

Stop Resetting Vendor Reviews Every Cycle

Questionnaire history, tier-based scoring, and reassessment cadence that persist across review cycles.

Where This Fits

See how this walkthrough connects to broader workflows