Track Risk Findings From Identification Through Remediation
See how remediation work is prioritized, assigned, and tied back to the risk or control it closes.
What you'll see
See the exact workflow, the proof that stays attached, and the control points that keep reviews from turning back into document chasing.
Sort Remediation by Priority and SLA
What you can verify in this walkthrough
You are seeing the live workflow, the attached proof trail, and the control points that matter once reviewers ask follow-up questions.
Consistent risk scoring
Every finding receives the same likelihood and impact evaluation so prioritization stays comparable across teams.
Treatment plans stay linked
Mitigation actions, owners, and timelines stay attached to the finding instead of living in a separate tracker.
Control linkage closes the loop
Risks connect to the controls that address them. Residual exposure is visible without cross-referencing spreadsheets.
Why this workflow matters
This workflow keeps the proof, ownership, and status context attached to the work itself, so teams do not rebuild evidence packages from scratch for each review cycle.
Tell us about the review, renewal, or framework rollout in front of you
In the live walkthrough, we map the workflow to your environment, show what stays current between review cycles, and open the governed handoff Aurora produces.
What Most Teams Open Next
Most teams follow this walkthrough with the next proof flow they need to tighten, whether that is evidence collection, reviewer sharing, or readiness follow-through.
Policy Governance
Track policy ownership, approvals, and version history in one governed record.
Aurora Copilot
See how Aurora drafts cited answers from your approved content and keeps every response reviewable.
Assessment Management
See how Aurora routes questionnaires, reuses approved answers, and tracks every follow-up to completion.