Framework mapping

Stay ready for China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 reviews

Map China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 to the controls and evidence your team already maintains, keep the record current between cycles, and answer auditors, customers, and security reviewers with traceable proof without rebuilding the record each time.

Request a 15-minute walkthrough Browse the library

124

Requirements

Mapped controls

173

Evidence specs

222

Test assertions

Sources

Domains

Automated

Published by GB/T 22239–2019 信息安全技术网络安全等级保护基本要求Latest: GB/T 22239–2019Mapping updated Mar 24, 2026View official source

Evidence automation

How China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 Evidence Gets Collected

Aurora maps framework requirements to evidence specifications with defined collection methods, cadence, and integration sources.

Collection methods

173evidence specs defined

15automated9%160manual

Collection cadence

175 scheduled

12P1Y4P6M1P3M1PT5M5P3Y1PT6H14Daily4Monthly32Quarterly26Semi-annual75Annual

Connected sources

AwsAzureAzure Monitor Logs PullCrowdstrike FalconDatadogGcpGithubGoogle WorkspaceIntuneJamf ProJumpcloudKandjiKnowbe4Microsoft Entra M365OktaRipplingSentineloneSlack AuditSplunk Hec ReceiverSyslog TlsTrinetWorkday

Control depth

Control Domains Mapped for China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0

Each mapped control carries evidence specifications, test assertions, and implementation guidance. Overlapping controls are reused across frameworks.

63of 88

Aurora controls mapped

Coverage

72%

Control domains

21 domains

Governance

Access Control

Data Protection

Network Security

Monitoring

Vendor Management

Secure Software Development

Physical Security

Business Continuity

Endpoint Security

Privacy

Training & Awareness

Risk Management

Cloud Security

Application Controls

Monitoring & Logging

Quality Management

Change Management

IT Service Management

Configuration Management

Asset Management

At a glance

What Teams Need to Know About China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0

Best for

Teams aligning to a published standard without rebuilding controls and evidence for each review cycle.

Reviewers expect

Mapped requirements, linked evidence, approval history, and structured exports for China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 reviews.

Where teams stall

Rebuilding control mappings and chasing evidence for each China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 review cycle instead of reusing a current record.

Governed exports

Control matrix
Evidence package
Reviewer portal access
Audit-period exports

Lifecycle signals

How Aurora Keeps China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 Current

Automated signals track evidence freshness, detect coverage gaps, and surface upcoming deadlines so teams stay ahead of review windows.

Evidence freshness tracking

Alerts when evidence artifacts approach expiration

Automation gap detection

Identifies controls without automated evidence collection

Training assignments

Links training requirements to framework controls

Assessment readiness

Tracks question coverage and approved answers

Calendar deadlines

Review window and renewal date tracking

Regulatory frameworks

Incident response timelines

Regulatory notification and response window tracking

Regulatory frameworks

Remediation tracking

Gap-to-fix workflows with owner assignment

Policy governance

Approval workflows, version tracking, and clause mapping

From request to handoff

How Teams Stay Review-Ready Between Cycles

Aurora turns one named framework request into a repeatable operating motion your team can maintain between audits, buyer reviews, and renewals.

Scope the exact version

Start with the China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 version your reviewer or buyer already asked for so the record matches the request in front of you.

Reuse the controls you already trust

Map overlapping requirements to the same governed control library instead of rebuilding the program around one framework.

Keep proof current between cycles

Attach evidence with owners, freshness expectations, and reminders so the package stays current while the business keeps moving.

Capture approvals and decisions

Keep policy approvals, exceptions, and review history linked to the same record so reviewers see the operating context, not just files.

Hand off a clean reviewer package

Share structured access or export a scoped package with mappings, evidence context, and timestamps already intact.

See It with Your Framework Compare Plans

Supported versions

Mapped Versions of China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0

Latest

GB/T 22239–2019

Source

124

Requirements

Controls

173

Evidence

222

Tests

Sources

Domains

Framework request

Don't See Your Framework?

If a framework, regulation, or customer requirement is blocking your deal, bring it. We scope feasibility, assess overlap with your existing program, and map a rollout path, usually in one call.

Step 1

Share the requirement

Name the framework, version, and review timeline so we confirm scope before anything else.

Step 2

We assess the overlap

Your existing controls, evidence, and mappings in Aurora are compared against the new requirement to quantify what carries over.

Step 3

Get a clear answer

Leave the call with a feasibility decision, rollout timeline, and next steps. Not a follow-up form.

Discuss Framework Coverage Browse All Frameworks

Common questions

China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 Questions, Answered Plainly

How does this fit alongside the frameworks we already run?

Aurora maps each framework into the same governed control and evidence system, so teams expand coverage without rebuilding the entire record.

How quickly can we support the next review cycle?

Tell us about the framework version and review window you need to support. Aurora helps your team move from mapped controls to traceable proof without rebuilding the package from scratch.

What does the reviewer actually receive?

Reviewers get structured access to the mapped record, linked evidence, approvals, and point-in-time exports instead of a loose collection of attachments.

Does Aurora replace the auditor or assessor?

No. Aurora keeps the work current, traceable, and ready to share. Auditors, assessors, and regulators remain independent.

Aurora does not guarantee certification, audit outcomes, or reviewer decisions. It organizes, tracks, and shares the evidence and mappings your team maintains.

Live walkthrough

Preparing for China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 review?

Share the version your reviewer asked for. We will show how Aurora maps China Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) 2.0 into your existing control library, keeps evidence current, and gives reviewers a clean handoff.

Request a 15-minute walkthrough

Browse integrations

15-minute walkthrough. No obligation. See Aurora applied to your workflow with the exact outputs reviewers receive. (No compliance guarantees.)