Framework mapping

Stay ready for Cyber Risk Institute Profile reviews

Map Cyber Risk Institute Profile to the controls and evidence your team already maintains, keep the record current between cycles, and answer auditors, customers, and security reviewers with traceable proof without rebuilding the record each time.

Request a 15-minute walkthrough Browse the library

318

Requirements

Mapped controls

234

Evidence specs

268

Test assertions

Sources

Domains

Automated

Published by Cyber Risk InstituteLatest: v2.1Mapping updated Feb 18, 2026View official source

Evidence automation

How Cyber Risk Institute Profile Evidence Gets Collected

Aurora maps framework requirements to evidence specifications with defined collection methods, cadence, and integration sources.

Collection methods

234evidence specs defined

16automated7%220manual

Collection cadence

236 scheduled

5P3Y16P1Y6P6M1PT6H1P3M1PT1H3annually and upon material change1at least annually (or per risk)12Daily1Weekly6Monthly43Quarterly30Semi-annual110Annual

Connected sources

BC/DR Program OwnerGRCOperationsRisk ManagementService OwnersAwsAzureCrowdstrike FalconGcpGithubGoogle WorkspaceIntuneJamf ProJumpcloudKandjiKnowbe4Microsoft Entra M365OktaQualysSentineloneSplunk Hec ReceiverTenable IoWiz

Control depth

Control Domains Mapped for Cyber Risk Institute Profile

Each mapped control carries evidence specifications, test assertions, and implementation guidance. Overlapping controls are reused across frameworks.

91of 88

Aurora controls mapped

Coverage

100%

Control domains

20 domains

Governance

Data Protection

Secure Software Development

Business Continuity

Access Control

IT Service Management

Vendor Management

Endpoint Security

Monitoring

Incident Response

Network Security

Risk Management

Configuration Management

Training & Awareness

Physical Security

Vulnerability Management

Service Management

HR Security

Asset Management

Change Management

At a glance

What Teams Need to Know About Cyber Risk Institute Profile

Best for

Teams aligning to a published standard without rebuilding controls and evidence for each review cycle.

Reviewers expect

Mapped requirements, linked evidence, approval history, and structured exports for Cyber Risk Institute Profile reviews.

Where teams stall

Rebuilding control mappings and chasing evidence for each Cyber Risk Institute Profile review cycle instead of reusing a current record.

Governed exports

Control matrix
Evidence package
Reviewer portal access
Audit-period exports

Lifecycle signals

How Aurora Keeps Cyber Risk Institute Profile Current

Automated signals track evidence freshness, detect coverage gaps, and surface upcoming deadlines so teams stay ahead of review windows.

Evidence freshness tracking

Alerts when evidence artifacts approach expiration

Automation gap detection

Identifies controls without automated evidence collection

Training assignments

Links training requirements to framework controls

Assessment readiness

Tracks question coverage and approved answers

Calendar deadlines

Review window and renewal date tracking

Regulatory frameworks

Incident response timelines

Regulatory notification and response window tracking

Regulatory frameworks

Remediation tracking

Gap-to-fix workflows with owner assignment

Policy governance

Approval workflows, version tracking, and clause mapping

From request to handoff

How Teams Stay Review-Ready Between Cycles

Aurora turns one named framework request into a repeatable operating motion your team can maintain between audits, buyer reviews, and renewals.

Scope the exact version

Start with the Cyber Risk Institute Profile version your reviewer or buyer already asked for so the record matches the request in front of you.

Reuse the controls you already trust

Map overlapping requirements to the same governed control library instead of rebuilding the program around one framework.

Keep proof current between cycles

Attach evidence with owners, freshness expectations, and reminders so the package stays current while the business keeps moving.

Capture approvals and decisions

Keep policy approvals, exceptions, and review history linked to the same record so reviewers see the operating context, not just files.

Hand off a clean reviewer package

Share structured access or export a scoped package with mappings, evidence context, and timestamps already intact.

See It with Your Framework Compare Plans

Supported versions

Mapped Versions of Cyber Risk Institute Profile

Latest

v2.1

Source

318

Requirements

Controls

234

Evidence

268

Tests

Sources

Domains

Framework request

Don't See Your Framework?

If a framework, regulation, or customer requirement is blocking your deal, bring it. We scope feasibility, assess overlap with your existing program, and map a rollout path, usually in one call.

Step 1

Share the requirement

Name the framework, version, and review timeline so we confirm scope before anything else.

Step 2

We assess the overlap

Your existing controls, evidence, and mappings in Aurora are compared against the new requirement to quantify what carries over.

Step 3

Get a clear answer

Leave the call with a feasibility decision, rollout timeline, and next steps. Not a follow-up form.

Discuss Framework Coverage Browse All Frameworks

Common questions

Cyber Risk Institute Profile Questions, Answered Plainly

How does this fit alongside the frameworks we already run?

Aurora maps each framework into the same governed control and evidence system, so teams expand coverage without rebuilding the entire record.

How quickly can we support the next review cycle?

Tell us about the framework version and review window you need to support. Aurora helps your team move from mapped controls to traceable proof without rebuilding the package from scratch.

What does the reviewer actually receive?

Reviewers get structured access to the mapped record, linked evidence, approvals, and point-in-time exports instead of a loose collection of attachments.

Does Aurora replace the auditor or assessor?

No. Aurora keeps the work current, traceable, and ready to share. Auditors, assessors, and regulators remain independent.

Aurora does not guarantee certification, audit outcomes, or reviewer decisions. It organizes, tracks, and shares the evidence and mappings your team maintains.

Live walkthrough

Preparing for Cyber Risk Institute Profile review?

Share the version your reviewer asked for. We will show how Aurora maps Cyber Risk Institute Profile into your existing control library, keeps evidence current, and gives reviewers a clean handoff.

Request a 15-minute walkthrough

Browse integrations

15-minute walkthrough. No obligation. See Aurora applied to your workflow with the exact outputs reviewers receive. (No compliance guarantees.)